Compensation awarded for breach of casual conversion clause
The Case
Tomvald v Toll Transportation Pty Ltd (2017)Toll Transportation Pty Ltd (Toll) employed Mr Tomvald as a casual employee for almost 10 years. In the 12-month period prior to Mr Tomvald making his application for permanency, Mr Tomvald had been working 38 hours per week. Toll offered Mr Tomvald permanent part-time status working 30 hours per week. He rejected the offer.
Mr Tomvald commenced proceedings in the Federal Court arguing Toll had breached the casual conversion clause of its enterprise agreement, which required him to be converted to a similar permanent status as he had been engaged in as a casual employee.
The Verdict
The Federal Court held that Toll had breached the enterprise agreement in that the enterprise agreement required Toll to offer Mr Tomvald permanent employment on a like-for-like basis, which was as a permanent full-time employee, not permanent part-time status.
Lesson for You
If you have casual employees in your workplace, check the terms of the casual conversion clause in the applicable modern award or your enterprise agreement to ascertain your obligations. If you have casual employees employed for an extended period and they are in essence doing the job performed by a permanent employee, consider converting them to permanent status. If you don’t, the casual may later claim at common law they were a permanent employee and seek redress for unpaid annual leave and personal/carer’s leave.
Get the latest employment law news, legal updates, case law and practical advice from our experts sent straight to your inbox every week.